Survey reveals recruiting paradox: Youngest HR decision-makers place the greatest emphasis on practical experience

Ironically, the youngest HR decision-makers are the ones who place the greatest emphasis on practical experience when evaluating candidates. Older generations, by contrast, place significantly more value on professional qualifications and the content of candidates’ university studies. This is according to our representative survey of 500 decision-makers in HR management in Germany. However, there is one point on which all generations agree: whether a degree was earned at a private or public university plays hardly any role in hiring decisions. The analysis was conducted on our behalf by opinion research institute Civey.

Generational shift in recruiting: Younger HR decision-makers prioritise practical experience, older generations focus on qualifications

HR decision-makers aged 18 to 29 consider practical experience by far the most important factor, with 95 percent citing it as a key criterion. Professional qualifications and the content acquired during university studies, by contrast, play hardly any role for this age group (1.7 percent). Ironically, the youngest decision-makers, therefore, have particularly high expectations when it comes to professional experience.

Among HR decision-makers aged 30 to 39, the focus shifts: for 71 percent, professional qualifications and university course content are central to the hiring decision, while practical experience, although still relevant at 55 percent, becomes less important. A similar pattern emerges among those aged 40 to 49: Here, too, professional qualifications are among the most important selection criteria, while academic grades regain relevance, cited by 29 percent.

Among HR decision-makers aged 50 to 64, theoretical knowledge and practical experience are rated almost equally. Among those aged 65 and over, social skills ultimately rank first at 84 percent, followed by professional qualifications (72 percent) and practical experience (58 percent).

Private or public: The type of university usually makes little difference in hiring decisions

When asked whether a degree from a private university makes a candidate more or less likely to be hired, more than 60 percent of respondents said that “it makes no difference.” Only 13.6 percent clearly stated that they would be less inclined to hire graduates of private universities.

The majority of respondents also see no differences between graduates of private and public universities when it comes to their qualifications. Where differences are perceived, private universities are more frequently associated with practical relevance (22.4 percent) and digital skills (23.2 percent). Public universities, on the other hand, are more likely to be associated with social skills (15.2 percent).

About the survey

The renowned market research institute Civey conducted an online survey on behalf of GGG between 4 and 23 February 2026, interviewing approximately 500 HR decision-makers in Germany. All data was collected through Civey’s proprietary panel of verified participants. Taking into account a statistical margin of error of 10.3 percentage points, the results are representative of the specified target population. Further information on the methodology is available here.


Related News

BSBI and EUNCET Establish Strategic Academic Partnership

BSBI Business School of Innovation has signed a strategic partnership with EUNCET Business School in Spain, marking another step in the institution’s internationalisation strategy. Formalised through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), the agreement establishes the framework for long-term collaboration in education, research and academic exchange.
Read More

Ahead of the Next AI Act Phase: Transparency Gaps at Germany's Largest Companies

How do German companies disclose their rules for the use of artificial intelligence? In our recent study, we analyzed 48 companies from three groups – DAX-40, online shops, and credit agencies – using a 10-point criteria catalogue for publicly documented AI governance. The assessment did not evaluate how well companies actually use AI, but exclusively how transparently they communicate their AI governance rules to the public.
Read More

Federal State Innovation Analysis: Ranking compares patent strength, start-up momentum and political innovation strategies

Baden-Württemberg is Germany’s most innovative federal state. This is the result of our latest analysis. Using a scoring system, we examined the number of start-up formations and patent applications per 100,000 inhabitants. In addition, coalition agreements were analyzed through keyword searches to evaluate how strongly innovation is prioritized politically.
Read More